The Memory of Istanbul: The Monastery's Manuscripts
In the discussion of Studite manuscripts, Nora’s concept of the lieux de mémoires is brought to light: If they lie at the intersection of historiographical and historical developments, then they lie amidst manuscripts, for these documents embody both as literal records and as precious artifacts – their value composed from the practical data they purposely display and the implicit information they contain as windows into a past world. Metaphorically speaking, the manuscripts of the Stoudios Monastery could thus be considered the very memories of Constantinople, packets of knowledge preserved by physical expression and the actions of the people who prize them. If manuscripts constitute the memories, then the Stoudios Monastery exists as the mind – the literal place of memory – where the manuscripts are produced and often stored. The artistry of the monastery scriptorium additionally helped to propel the significance of the institution; Christian manuscripts created in Stoudios are scattered throughout the modern world[1], their existence endured by an appreciation for the memories they contain.
More so, the scriptorium of the Stoudios Monastery retained importance well beyond the Byzantine era; in the west, Gutenberg developed his printing press, but the Ottoman Turks that conquered Constantinople, and thus renamed it Istanbul, rejected the use of the machine[2]. Even when the Stoudios Monastery itself was altered under the new regime, its manuscript production process remained essential.


